Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

Author: eknk

August undefined, 2024

WebHowever, Ganesh Bhavan Patel V. State of Maharashtra, is an authority for the proposition that delay in recording of statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161 of the Cr. P. C, although those witnesses were or could be available for examination when the investigating officer visited the Nikita Gadgil 8/12 ::: Uploaded on - 18/09 ... WebMar 31, 2024 · In Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra [(1978) 4 SCC 371: AIR 1979 SC 135] the eye witnesses to the crime proper was examined with a delay of one day. Though the delay of a few hours may not by itself constitute a serious infirmity, that there are concomitant circumstances which suggest that the investigator was deliberately marking ...

State Of U.P v. Satish . Supreme Court Of India Judgment Law ...

WebHe relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Anr. v. State of Maharashtrareported in 1979 Cri.LJ. 51 and the judgments of this Court in the cases of Popat Balu Vanjari v. State of Maharashtraand The State of Maharashtra v. Wafati Babu Qureshi and Ors. reported in 1997 All MR (Cri) 518. WebGanesh Bhavan Patel & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 18 October, 1978. Citedby 1 docs Ram Kishan And Ors. vs The State Of Rajasthan on 8 May, 2007. Tuesday vs By Advs.Dr.K.P.Kylasanatha ... on 25 January, 2003 ... Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra (1984) 58 Cut LT 101, Smt. Dhare Dei v. Prafulla Swain and , Babu Lodhi v. food processor smoothie blender

Ganesh Bhavan Patel VS State Of Maharashtra - LawCanvas

WebGanesh Bhavan Patel and another, Appellants Versus State of Maharashtra, Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 64 of 1974, D/- 18-10-1978. ... Pramila asked the assailants as to … WebSep 23, 1993 · In (1978) SCC 371 : ( AIR 1979 SC 135) (Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra). The Apex Court was pleased..., AIR 1976 SC 975 (Bhagrith v. WebIn this regard, he relied upon the pronouncement of the Apex Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, . Highlighting the same, he further contended that even though the police were aware of the incident much earlier to 9'0 clock as the police station is hardly one forlong away from the Crime seene, non action on the ... election results ottumwa ia

Ganesh Bhavan Patel And Another v. State Of Maharashtra

State Of Maharashtra vs Priya Sharan Maharaj & Ors on 11 …

WebAllowing the appeal, Ganesh Bhavan Patel & ANR Vs. State of Maharashtra [1978] INSC 209 (18 October 1978) SARKARIA, RANJIT SINGH SARKARIA, RANJIT SINGH CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ( (CJ) REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA (J) CITATION: 1979 AIR 135 1979 SCR (2) 94 1978 SCC (4) 371. CITATOR INFO: WebIt is well settled that the appellate Court should be slow in disturbing the finding of fact of the trial Court, and, even if two views are reasonably possible, it is not expected to interfere simply because it feels that it would have taken a different view if the case had been tried by it (See: : Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra.). 10. election results ouachita parish 2022WebThe approach has been endorsed by this court repeatedly, and in a very recent decision, Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra 1979 2 SCR 94 to which one of us (Sarkaria, J.) was party, it was also observed: [ SCC p. 376: SCC (Cri) p. 5, para 13] food processors of canada website

"WebIn this context it would be useful to refer to the observations of Their Lordships of the Apex Court in paragraph 15 and 18 of the judgment Ganesh Bhawan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, which are to the following effect : "15 ..... " - Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

Ajit Singh Thakur Singh And Another v. State Of Gujarat

WebAug 14, 1997 · State of Tripura 1986 1 SCC 549; Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1979 SC 135; Awadhesh v. State of M.P [1988 2 SCC 557 = 1988 3 … WebFeb 2, 2014 · Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Another vs. State of Maharashtra (1978) 4 SCC 371, Aleque Padamsee and Others vs. Union of India and Others (2007) 6 SCC 171, …

Did you know?

WebIn this claim, he relied on the following decisions, viz., Bhajan Lal (supra), Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Another v. State of Maharashtra (1978), Aleque Padamsee and Others v. Union of India and Others (2007), Ramesh Kumari (supra), Ram Lal Narang b. State of Delhi (1979) and Lallan Chaudhary and Others v. State of Bihar and Another (2006). WebMay 12, 1994 · In Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra (supra) relied on by the defence this Court considered the inordinate delay in recording the statements of witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and other circumstances along with the fact that the FIR was lodged belatedly without proper explanation and then held that the prosecution case was …

WebLearned counsel relying on the said case of Jaggo (supra) as also another case of the judgment of this Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patil and Another v. State of Maharashtra, submitted that non-mentioning of the names of PWs 1 and 5 in the FIR and delay in examining the said witnesses makes the presence of these eye witnesses doubtful. It is … WebSTATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ..RESPONDENT(S) 1 WWW.LIVELAW.IN LL 2024 SC 614. J U D G M E N T M. R. Shah, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied …

Webpetitioner: ganesh bhavan patel & anr. vs. respondent: state of maharashtra date of judgment18/10/1978 bench: sarkaria, ranjit singh bench: sarkaria, ranjit singh … Web(See State of U.P. V Satish, (2005) 3 SCC 114, Padala Veera Reddy v State of A.P., 1989 Supp (2) SCC 706, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116, Gambhir v State of Maharashtra, (1982) 2 SCC 351 (para 9) and Hanumant Govind Nargundkar v State of M.P., AIR 1952 SC

WebThe witness was proceeding towards his office situated in Bhaveshwar Nagar, Building No 3 in the third street, on Mahatma Gandhi Road. When he in his car came in front of the …

Web[514D-F; H Warren Ducane Smith v. The King A.I.R. 1934 P.C.227 & Ganesh Bhavan Patel & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra [1979] 2 S.C.R. 94, referred to. (iii) The High Court … food processors on ebayWebApr 28, 1992 · State Of Rajasthan (33) (3), Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra (4) and Lala Ram v. State of U.P (5). (6) The learned public prosecutor duly supported the conviction and sentence under challenge. He contended that the FIR Ex. P/1 was lodged within two hours and 5 minutes of the occurrence when the Police Station was at a … election results overland park ksWebApr 28, 2024 · Ganesh Bhavan Patel & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 18 October, 1978. Section 34 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ... It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, reported in (1978) 4 SCC 371 in paragraphs 15 and 47, which read as under: election results outstandingWebPETITIONER: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RESPONDENT: PRIYA SHARAN MAHARAJ & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/03/1997 BENCH: G.N. RAY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T NANAVATI Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel. On 11.5.91, one Purushottam Wasudeo Deshpande lodged a complaint … food processors of canadaWebDeshmukh v. State of Maharashtra, reported in (2008) 11 SCC 186 has held as under : 13. ... benefit of doubt (vide Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, Babu v. State of U.P., Awadhesh v. State of M.P., Thanedar Singh v. State of M.P. and State of Rajasthan v. Raja Ram). 5 food processors on sale amazonWeb6. Reliance is also placed on the decision of Supreme Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra - wherein was held that "delay of a few hours, simpliciter, in recording the statements of eye witnesses may not, by itself, amount to a serious infirmity in the prosecution case. But it may assume such a character if there are concomitant ... election results owatonnaWebSee ( 1978) 4 SCC 371 : A.I.R 1979 Supreme Court 135 1 ( Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra ). 4. Before concluding we may in passing mention that the sale in the instant case was of 18th January 1972 i.e over 16 years ago. The acquittal order is of 12th May 1980 over eight years ago. 5. election results overall